<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caution to writers who use online images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inkygirl.com/caution-to-writers-who-use-online-images/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inkygirl.com/caution-to-writers-who-use-online-images/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:13:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Katherine Huether</title>
		<link>http://www.inkygirl.com/caution-to-writers-who-use-online-images/comment-page-1/#comment-3557</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine Huether</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inkygirl.com/caution-to-writers-who-use-online-images/#comment-3557</guid>
		<description>I use public domain photos all the time - I don&#039;t take much of my own. I try to pay attention to the rules, but thinking about this topic this morning has made me think about being extra careful. I just imagine how I&#039;d feel if I let a photo go into the public domain, and someone didn&#039;t follow my stipulations - I&#039;d be upset!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use public domain photos all the time &#8211; I don&#8217;t take much of my own. I try to pay attention to the rules, but thinking about this topic this morning has made me think about being extra careful. I just imagine how I&#8217;d feel if I let a photo go into the public domain, and someone didn&#8217;t follow my stipulations &#8211; I&#8217;d be upset!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mari</title>
		<link>http://www.inkygirl.com/caution-to-writers-who-use-online-images/comment-page-1/#comment-3530</link>
		<dc:creator>Mari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inkygirl.com/caution-to-writers-who-use-online-images/#comment-3530</guid>
		<description>Still, it makes you think. Nothing and no one is safe any more. Not really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, it makes you think. Nothing and no one is safe any more. Not really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ninja-bot</title>
		<link>http://www.inkygirl.com/caution-to-writers-who-use-online-images/comment-page-1/#comment-3519</link>
		<dc:creator>Ninja-bot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inkygirl.com/caution-to-writers-who-use-online-images/#comment-3519</guid>
		<description>Regardless off the image&#039;s copyright settings on Flickr, if people leave the &quot;Blog This!&quot; button on their images (removable in privacy settings on Flickr) then you&#039;re allowing online writers/bloggers free reign to use your images. 

The upshot? You get an auto link-back when the feature is used. 

When in doubt, don&#039;t publicly post high-res versions of your illustrations/photography, and don&#039;t post your work in 300 phacking Flickr groups. It just turns into a circle jerking love fest with everyone putting dumb &quot;You&#039;re My Flickr Hero!&quot; trophies in the comments anyways, which while it may give you a bang, doesn&#039;t really further your work in any way, shape, or form.

You can be sure any photos I consider for stock either doesn&#039;t touch flickr, or only really small version that aren&#039;t publicly searchable are made available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless off the image&#8217;s copyright settings on Flickr, if people leave the &#8220;Blog This!&#8221; button on their images (removable in privacy settings on Flickr) then you&#8217;re allowing online writers/bloggers free reign to use your images. </p>
<p>The upshot? You get an auto link-back when the feature is used. </p>
<p>When in doubt, don&#8217;t publicly post high-res versions of your illustrations/photography, and don&#8217;t post your work in 300 phacking Flickr groups. It just turns into a circle jerking love fest with everyone putting dumb &#8220;You&#8217;re My Flickr Hero!&#8221; trophies in the comments anyways, which while it may give you a bang, doesn&#8217;t really further your work in any way, shape, or form.</p>
<p>You can be sure any photos I consider for stock either doesn&#8217;t touch flickr, or only really small version that aren&#8217;t publicly searchable are made available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harald</title>
		<link>http://www.inkygirl.com/caution-to-writers-who-use-online-images/comment-page-1/#comment-3518</link>
		<dc:creator>Harald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inkygirl.com/caution-to-writers-who-use-online-images/#comment-3518</guid>
		<description>A variation discussion Creative Commons licensing, but also goes into photo sharing in general:

http://danheller.blogspot.com/2008/01/gaming-creative-commons-for-profit.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A variation discussion Creative Commons licensing, but also goes into photo sharing in general:</p>
<p><a href="http://danheller.blogspot.com/2008/01/gaming-creative-commons-for-profit.html" rel="nofollow">http://danheller.blogspot.com/2008/01/gaming-creative-commons-for-profit.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
